Wednesday, 30 April 2014
'Remorse' - The Final Cut
This is the final cut of our film opening sequence. This differs from the previous cut by incorporating a non-diegetic voice over. We found that timing the lines in correlation to the music helped to emphasise the element of sadness, giving the voice over, and the narrative as a whole, more substance and meaning. Comparing this to our first cut, we can conclusively say that this is a much more appealing and professional looking product. Doing multiple cuts also made us feel more confident to add in new aspects with every cut, so that when we reached our final cut all of these technical areas worked together to solidify the idea that this is a good example of a film that sticks to the conventions of the crime/drama genre and fulfils the need of an opening, which is to grip and entice audience members and make them feel compelled to continue watching for the sake of closure.
- Ryan Chapman -
Rough cut 3
This is the third cut of 'Remorse,' with more fine tuning to shots, in regards to the framing and transitions used. The most notable change is that we have now added some non-diegetic music to help establish a contemplating tone to mirror the character. We found the gentle piano ballad worked well with the opening, especially because we found that, in our research, similar music styles can be seen to give the product more depth.
- Ryan Chapman -
Tuesday, 29 April 2014
Rough Cut 2
Feedback
Comparing this to our first rough cut, there is a clear distinction in quality, in regards to our uses of camera and narrative style. It's clear we took more care with conveying our opening in a more gradually enigmatic and artist way, with more varied shot types that reflect the main protagonist's current state of mind. That being said, as seen in our teacher's comments, there are still certain elements we need to capitalise on for our next cut if we want to get as many marks as possible. Luckily, because none of us in the group were in the opening sequence we won't have to go back and film again, which means the filming aspect of this task is now complete. This means we will be focusing our time on post production elements within the film making process. For example, adding non-diegetic music will help to better establish a mood and tone, while a different font type will also aid in defining our genre. We will fully utilise this feedback we've been given and do our best to incorporate all of these elements into our next cut. - Ryan Chapman - After showing this opening to 20 people in our target audience, there was a key piece of feedback. There is no sound throughout the entire clip. This piece of music would add atmosphere to the opening, they had also said there is no |
Thursday, 17 April 2014
Rough Cut 1
Feedback
'You need an institutional logo - at least one at the start
You need at least another 30 seconds of footage
The notebook on the bench is not great
Your titles are not in the correct order - look at your research for this
The voice over is not good - there are gaps in it - will you add in non diegetic music?
The Film Title font and lavishness is bad - does not fit in with the genre
Some of the shots are out of focus and need to be filmed again
The narrative doesn't make sense - does he love him? who is it? I thought it was meant to be a gangster film - it feels like a love story at the moment.'
- Miss Peacock and Mr Bluck -
Improvements
Looking back at the opening and the feedback we received, regarding it's authenticity, there are some important changes we need to make for our next cut. For example, unfortunately on the day of our shoot the actor we planned to have in it was unable to attend and I had to step in. This meant I would then be unable to receive any marks when it came to the topic of camera and thus impacting my over all grade. Knowing this, for the next cut we will ensure there is no scheduling conflicts with our actor and that they can act in a way that conveys the character in a more enigmatic way to help better establish our genre. We will take all of our feedback from teachers, family and friends alike into consideration for our next cut to improve the overall quality of our opening and give it a more professional feel.
- Ryan Chapman -
Wednesday, 16 April 2014
Filming Diary
Day 1:
The first
day that we began our filming our film opening we had several issues
to solve. The largest issue was that the original actor that we had
planned to use did not show up for the shoot. This created a large
problem as we were unable to get anyone else to fill in, so we had to
use one of our group members in the film. We had originally planned
on staying in the location (Admirals Park) for roughly 3 hours,
however, as we did arrive later than expected at 4:30pm we had to
accelerate our filming as we had roughly 2 hours of sunlight left in
the day. This did at first cause some concern as to if we needed a
second day to film the rest of our opening but we were able to fit in
all the shots that we need and we left with about half an hour
remaining. Over the next couple of days we spent a large
amount of time editing our first rough cut together. We knew this was
a rough cut but we still put a lot of hard work into creating a
professional looking piece. After showing our product to an audience
and our teachers we have been given a list of improvements that we
need to do whilst in editing and while we are filming. The biggest
thing is that we needed to make it longer as it was too short to be a
film opening. From this feedback we were given we are going to be
able to improve on our original piece and create an even more
professional looking piece.
Luckily, because I (Ryan) came up with the main protagonist's characteristics, he had a good idea of how to portray him and the qualities within him. This was challenging though, not just because it was short notice that I would have to play him but also because there wasn't any diegetic pieces of dialogue nor close ups to convey the character's attributes. This meant I had to focus on his physicality, specifically his body language, showing that sense of remorse and regret by looking at the environment in quite a contemplating way, and therefore displaying that sense of doubt that helped to present the enigmatic tone we, as a group, wanted to achieve with this opening sequence. Despite the visual weather on camera being sunny, it was also very windy the first day we filmed, which, on top of the impending night time darkness, made us feel all the more compelled to finish shooting as quickly as possible. The wind also didn't help us, in regards to our camera work, especially with the numerous panning shots we have in our sequence, because it resulted in the camera being harder to control steadily on the tripod. While doing our best to control the stability of the camera itself, we also tried our best to make the panning shots appear as smooth and thus professional as possible, however, looking back at our first rough cut, we can now see and understand why this was not achieved.
Day 2:

Luckily, because I (Ryan) came up with the main protagonist's characteristics, he had a good idea of how to portray him and the qualities within him. This was challenging though, not just because it was short notice that I would have to play him but also because there wasn't any diegetic pieces of dialogue nor close ups to convey the character's attributes. This meant I had to focus on his physicality, specifically his body language, showing that sense of remorse and regret by looking at the environment in quite a contemplating way, and therefore displaying that sense of doubt that helped to present the enigmatic tone we, as a group, wanted to achieve with this opening sequence. Despite the visual weather on camera being sunny, it was also very windy the first day we filmed, which, on top of the impending night time darkness, made us feel all the more compelled to finish shooting as quickly as possible. The wind also didn't help us, in regards to our camera work, especially with the numerous panning shots we have in our sequence, because it resulted in the camera being harder to control steadily on the tripod. While doing our best to control the stability of the camera itself, we also tried our best to make the panning shots appear as smooth and thus professional as possible, however, looking back at our first rough cut, we can now see and understand why this was not achieved.Day 2:
The second day of shooting we had to re-film our scenes as we had a different actor so we re-filmed to create a sense of continuity throughout the film. As we were filming during the day at 1:30 we were no longer rushing our filming so we were able to take as many takes as we needed before we thought we could move on. We were in the same location as before (Admirals Park) but we had arranged for a different more reliable actor to use in our film. We have also added in a few extra shots and extended the time of some shots. This will hopefully extend the overall time of the film opening to a more acceptable length.
Having more time to shoot meant we were also able to make the opening appear more artistic on screen, with a higher attention to detail, in regards to the cinematography. I (Ryan) also took into consideration the connotations within each shot, making a point of conveying this single character as the stereotypically masculine, yet remorseful male we had planned to from the start. For example, we used multiple low angle shots to present this male as a physically dominant protagonist and amplify the stock character of a humanising, mourning and vengeful businessman, quickly establish this narrative as being very much character driven. The weather also worked in our favour more so on this day of filming than the previous, with the dark clouds helping to highlight the depressing and solitary tone we wanted to get across. When we compared this to our original footage we found that the less vibrant weather conditions worked a lot better in correlation to our narrative than the sunshine that can be seen throughout the first rough cut.

- Peter Godwin + Ryan Chapman -
Monday, 24 March 2014
Filming schedule
The dates filming took place were March 21st and April 6th. Luckily, because the sequence is relatively short and the locations minimal, we were able to get all the shots done in this time frame. The first date was the one in which I stepped in to be the actor and the second was a result of us having to reshoot and extend the running time, with a new actor being present and taking my place as the main protagonist.
- Ryan Chapman -
- Ryan Chapman -
Sunday, 23 March 2014
Consent form
Before filming began, we needed our actor to sign a consent form to confirm that we had their permission to film them and that they understood what their role would entitle, this also sorts out any legal formalities. this also allows us to post the video on Blogger and YouTube with no breach in their privacy.
~Ryan Chapman, Christina Fraser, and Peter Godwin~
~Ryan Chapman, Christina Fraser, and Peter Godwin~
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)



